Fish farming: how does it affect the environment?
Do you know where the fish you eat comes from?
It is viewed that eating fish is more ecological than eating meat;
however this can be seriously questioned as we learn about Aquaculture practices.
What is Aquaculture?
Just as Agriculture is the domestication of land (plants and animals), Aquaculture is the domestication of the ocean.
Why are we fish farming?
Our consumption of fish have outstripped the natural capacity of freshwater and marine fisheries. These can no longer provide enough supply. Fisheries are now considered to be fully or over-exploited (1). Therefore, Aquaculture provides an increasing proportion of fish supply and this will continue to rise.
How does it impact on the environment?
Intensive Aquaculture operations are held near freshwater streams, in the sea or on the coast. These practices are chemically and genetically destructive (2).
1. Fish faeces & feed: production of sediments.
2. Ammonium excretion
2. Ammonia=toxic and uses oxygen during oxidation to nitrate-> oxygen depletion
Aquaculture uses on average, more than one tonne of O2 to produce one tonne of fish (6).
Harms organisms around the fish farms, leading to destruction of ecosystems.
Domesticated fish adapt to captivity (making ‘weak’ genes, or non-adapted to the wild), as many escapes occur, these fish mate with the wild ones, risking of spreading their ‘weak’ genes (3).
Causes further stress on fragile species and increases their risk of extinction
Intensive farming means increase risk of diseases. To treat these, fishes are given antibiotics (6).
Release of antibiotics into the environment-> harms sensitive species + increases the rate of evolution of resistant bacteria (6).
The risk of diseases increases in fish farms, infestation of diseases put at risk nearby species at risk of also being infected (4).
Harms sensitive species
Considering all the pollutants the ocean contains, is eating fish healthy?
A study looking at the concentration of organochlorine contaminants in salmons found that these were higher in farmed salmon than in the wild ones. Furthermore, it was found that European-raised salmon had significantly greater contaminant loads than fish farmed in North and South America.
The conclusion made by this study was that the consumption of farmed Atlantic salmon may pose health risks that outweigh the beneficial effect of fish consumption (7).
Intensive Aquaculture is very harmful to the environment and in addition fish accumulates many contaminants that are present in the sea. Therefore it is questionable whether consuming it is worth its beneficial effect.
Decreasing fish consumption and favoring organic farmed fish which is less intensive and does not use antibiotics is an ethical option, or you can check out our recipes and guidebooks and get inspired to live a plant-based diet!
You are informed, you, as a consumer, guide the direction the big industries take.
Consume better and less that is the mantra!
Did you like this article?
This original content has been offered for free without advertisements thanks to our readers’ contributions. You, too, can support us in many ways. Check out how here! Thank you
Copyright, Nature Going Smart. May not be re-printed without permission.
(1)FAO 2009. 139th Meeting of the AFS-Sustainable Global Fisheries-Sustainable Fisheries: the Importance of the Bigger Picture. Nashville, Tennessee (USA).
(2) Marra (2005).When will we tame the ocean. Nature436:175-176
(3)Vasemagi (2005). Extensive immigration from compensatory hatchery releases into wild Atlantic salmon population in the Baltic sea: spatio-temporal analysis over 18 years, Heredity95: 76–83.
(4) Rosenberg (2008).The price of lice. Nature 451:23-24
(5) Braithwaite (2010).Aquaculture and restocking: implications for conservation and welfare. Animal welfare19:139-149.
(6) Warner (1993). Fish farming and the environment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology109:39–51.
(7) Hites (2004). Global Assessment of Organic contaminants in farmed Salmon. Science 9:226-9.